Could Battlefied 3 beat Call of Duty

In two words: HELL YES!!! This game is amazing. I absolutely love this game. It is so fun.

I used to like Call of Douchey more than Battlefield until I discovered Battlefield: Bad Company. The realism was amazing and their was nothing more fun than detonating C4 on a wall to blow up it and the person behind it.

The Multiplayer is the main point of Battlefield 3. Multiplayer is what Battlefield has always been about. Even though there are only 24 players per match (on the Xbox 360), chaos reigns down like Hellfire. There is nothing scarier and more awesome than a jet duel in the skies leading to a plane crashing right in front of you and destroying the bui.ding you were heading into (this happened twice in one match). There are a few bugs, but that is to be expected especially on day one. Vehicle combat is amazing, except for the helicopters. They are much more difficult to fly than in any other Battlefield game. Other than that, the ovarall experience of multiplayer is about a 9.5/ 10.

There is not much to talk about when dealing with the campaign. It isn't bad so far (I haven't finished it yet). It is very different from Call of Duty. You die alot faster even on Normal difficulty. It takes alot more skill to do the campaign then it did before. I would probably give the campaign an 8.5/ 10.

In total, I would think Battlefield 3 may not beat Call of Duty, but it will set in motion the way for Battlefield to hopefully take Call of Duty's top spot on the list of shooters.

Overall score = 9.5/ 10